If you need less of one thing, you wouldn't buy more, right?
That's not what Connecticut's Department of Children and Families is doing. DCF says there's been a 30 percent drop in need for residential treatment of kids with medical, psychological or behavioral issues.
At the same time, DCF says, it will pay for 111 new beds.
Confused? You should be.
Less demand is DCF's rationale for closing Hamden's High Meadows, a residential facility for very sick boys.
So why is DCF closing that 43-bed facility only to pay for 111 beds elsewhere?
Surprisingly that question didn't arise at last week's hearing on whether DCF can close High Meadows.
High Meadows is the only facility in the state with 24-hour medical care on-site. It takes in boys that other facilities refuse to treat because of their complex diagnoses.
In February, Gov. Jodi Rell tried to shut down High Meadows by erasing it from her budget.
In September, the Democrat-led state legislature thought they saved High Meadows by passing a budget that included full funding for the facility.
On Friday, DCF held a hearing to close High Meadows, despite a legal opinion from state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal that says closing High Meadows would be illegal, because the state funded it in the budget.
The hearing was held before the state Office of Health Care Access (OHCA), which will issue its decision by Nov. 24. By law, OHCA's decision must be based on whether there is a need for High Meadows.
Staff and families say yes, there is.
Marta Reyes testified about the progress her 16-year-old son Juan has made at High Meadows. Juan has several issues, including anxiety so severe that his mother has had to skip holiday and family gatherings for years.
"We were so lonely during the holidays," Reyes said at the hearing.
But Juan has improved enough at High Meadows that he went to a family function this year, says his mother.
"That is such a big deal to my family," she says.
Juan has been in and out of hospitals for years, Reyes says, and High Meadows is the only place where she's seen him improve.
Juan is one of only 12 boys left at High Meadows.
In DCF's attempts to empty the facility, some boys have been transferred to state- and privately-run facilities. Two have been sent out of state.
Back in February, DCF Commissioner Susan Hamilton told High Meadows staff that the facility would close because of budget issues.
At last week's hearing, she told OHCA the facility should close because there's no need for it.
Citing numbers and statistics, she and her staff testified that DCF has seen a reduction in the number of kids in residential treatment facilities.
A few minutes later, Hamilton and staff were talking about getting 111 privately-run new beds at facilities across the state.
"If there's a 30 percent reduction in need, why are there 111 new beds?" asks the state child advocate Jeanne Milstein, who has followed the High Meadows debacle, but was not at the hearing.
"They're talking about the decrease in residential use, which is very good news," she says. "So why are the beds increasing?"
No one from OHCA asked that question, much to the chagrin of High Meadows staff.
Commissioner Hamilton refused to answer questions from a reporter, saying, "I'm not giving media statements."
Gary Kleeblatt, DCF's spokesman, says the 111 new beds will be for developmentally disabled kids, and starting early next year those beds will be used to start bringing home the more than 300 kids DCF has shipped out-of-state.
"Kids out of state are receiving services that don't exist in Connecticut," he says.
But Bob Genzano, a rehabilitation therapist at High Meadows, argues that High Meadows already offers those services. If the facility's admissions were reopened, some of its 43 beds could be used to bring home kids from out of state.
Instead, DCF will close those 43 beds to pay for 111 more. "That just seems like faulty logic," says Genzano.